Re: DITA licence -- acceptable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:26:13AM +1000, Ruediger Landmann wrote:
> On 01/22/2014 09:00 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> >Would this affect any other DTDs Fedora is shipping? Many of them
> >are used widely in our XML and HTML validation tools, so as a
> >former docs guy this opinion caught my attention.
> 
> Not AFAIK. The big one, of course, is DocBook, and that's very
> plainly freely licensed:
> 
> "Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the DocBook XML DTD
> and its accompanying documentation for any purpose and without fee
> is hereby granted in perpetuity, provided that the above copyright
> notice and this paragraph appear in all copies."
> 
> http://docbook.org/xml/4.5/docbookx.dtd
> 
> Basically, it's up to each OASIS TC to decide how they want to
> license their stuff; and it's up to every would-be Fedora packager
> to check :)

Thanks Rudi.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
    The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux