Haïkel <hguemar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > 3. execute the change (packagers + provenpackagers), Honestly I feel this should instead be: 3. execute the change (people who want this) Figuring out the proper tag could potentially involve a re-review of the licensing of a large number of packages, to account for the situations where there isn't simply a 1-to-1 mapping between our current tags and this new setup. There just isn't enough obvious benefit (to me, anyway, though I really doubt I'm alone) to push this change through without a set of people already lined up to do the work. > As we have already standardized our licensing nomenclature, it would > easily automatable (update git but not necessarily with rebuild). If it's that easy, the script to convert everything should also be provided by those who want this change. Or at least a really simple set of instructions between what we now have and what you would want us to have. I'd expect to see that document pretty much up front, before anyone else sinks time into this. Also, this gets us away from the current process of "ask fedora-legal if you see some new license" to... something else, since we no longer control the tags. Someone needs to document the "something else", and preferably set up some Fedora contact who will handle whatever interaction is needed with whatever standards group is involved. - J< _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
