On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 02:18:58PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: > I think you either need to use the Fedora Remix mark or go through the > process of creating a new secondary mark, because you're talking about > distributing "things" that are marked in a way that implies that Fedora > made them, even if they're not at the same supported level. > > I don't think its a problem to have Fedora people making Remixes. > > If you create a new secondary mark, the existing trademark guidelines > would need to be amended to reflect it. Thanks Tom. I'll start exploring that, then, because I definitely want something "closer" than Remix implies. Particularly, I'd like to keep some of the guarantees that Remix does not provide, like "100% free and open source software that is legally redistributable everywhere in the world". It also might apply to services, or maybe even things which contain _zero_ traditional-official-Fedora software, both of which I think would be straining the idea of "Remix". -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
