I want to host some Fedora cloud images on a website for people to download. These are constructed using a kickstart which just installs @Core into a VM, as simple as it gets. To comply with licensing, I was planning to point people who wanted source back to Fedora, since we don't make any modifications. Also I will publish the kickstart file and the short (20 line) shell script that makes the images. However the question arises if we need to do anything else from a licensing / providing source / other legal point of view? For example, is it a problem that Fedora deletes old SRPMs? Is it a problem if we don't host the source ourselves? Does the trademark exception cover our (non-commercial, community) offering, assuming I comply with the required terms here? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines#Usage_That_Does_Not_Require_Permission Basically, in the words of Donald Rumsfeld, are there any "unknown unknowns" I should be aware of? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
