On Wednesday 16 of March 2016 09:17:49 Richard Fontana wrote: > > The other thing is that it does not seem to be the right place to download > > sources from OSGi, but rather like some build-product sources (side effect > > of maven build?), but I'm not sure. So trying to find authoritative > > sources leads to [1], but that forces me to "Accept": > > > > "OSGi Specification License, Version 2.0." > > > > [1] Marek posted this before: > > http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release5?info=nothanks > > So do you know if the authoritative sources are actually obtainable if > you do accept, or have you not checked because you don't feel > comfortable accepting? I haven't accepted mostly because OSGi Specification License is not "Good" based on [1], without much thinking about it - but yes, it is not comfortable and sounds like unnecessary in FOSS. So I do not know whether the sources are there at all. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Pavel _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
