Re: [Fedora-packaging] questions about license file migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Callaway wrote:
> I don't foresee any situation in which a file containing a list of
> copyright holders that is distinct and separate from the file containing
> the license text (pause to catch my breath) would be necessary to treat
> as %license. %doc should be sufficient there.
> 
> That said, if you end up in a situation where you (the packager) feels
> strongly that the upstream separation of copyright holders and license
> text would somehow cause the license text to be incomplete, feel free to
> either bring those specifics to this email list, or tag them both as
> %license and explain it in a comment in the spec file.

Thanks, that answers my second question. Then I'll continue including
lists of authors in the same subpackage as the license, but with %doc,
unless I come across some really special case.

Björn Persson

Attachment: pgprJPMI0iojr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux