On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:00:27PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:22:00PM +0100, Tristan Santore wrote: > > >>The last sentence. I think it would be better to say: > > >>...to use their contents for purpose of fixing bugs. > > >>Or something similar. Now it seems that once you submit personal data, > > >>Fedora may use them to <insert evil purpose here>. > > >>Promise to not abuse the data would also work for me. > > >This makes sense to me. I'll add. > > I hate to be pessimistic. Legally a promise to not use something for > > an "evil" purpose is meaningless. Unless you specify what exactly > > you will prevent/protect against, outside the scope of your local > > data protection laws. > > Yeah, I think we're familiar with that from the (banned in Fedora) > "don't be evil" clauses in licenses. But I think Paul was saying he'd > add the more specific thing — what we _will_ use it for: fixing bugs. That's correct. The policy should state outright what the contents are to be used for. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
