Björn Persson wrote: > The MySQL++ User Manual has another license than the library itself, > but the -manuals subpackage inherits its License field from the main > package. This shall be fixed, but it's not obvious what the license of > the manual should be called. It's described as follows: > > | The MySQL++ User Manual is licensed under a unique license derived from > | the Linux Documentation Project License. (The only changes are due to > | the fact that the User Manual isn't actually part of the LDP, so a lot > | of the language in the LDPL doesn't make sense when applied to the user > | manual.) > > The license text is included below. Shall I call this license "LDPL", > or does it need a name of its own? I went ahead and called it "LDPL". Björn Persson
Attachment:
pgpoiPpMiGzgU.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
