Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/11/2014 11:41 AM, Richard Fontana wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 03/10/2014 04:33 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
>>> And I find that I do not know the answer.
>>> What is the trick that Ubuntu can host on PPA, Lunchpad etc. restricted
>>> content, but Fedora can not?
>>
>> As pointed out, Canonical is not a US based company, Red Hat is. We're
>> forced to comply with the awful mess of software patents and other US
>> specific legal restrictions.
> 
> Actually this idea I've been hearing for many years now that Canonical inherently does not face software patent issues because it is not *based* in the US makes no sense. 

Whether Canonical actually avoids software patent issues or not is
academic, at best. They think they do, they act as if they do. We _know_
that we cannot do these things.

~tom

==
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> OSAS @ Red Hat
University Outreach || Fedora Special Projects || Fedora Legal
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux