-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Creative Commons is pushing the use of their 4.0 license (which I have no qualms with). Has/can legal review this new license[0] as a drop-in replacement for the 3.0 license[1] we are currently using for Fedora Documentation (with the waiving the rights to enforce Section 4d)? I'm unsure of any benefits or regressions we would have (I haven't personally compared the two and IANAL). Thanks. [0] https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode [1] https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode - -- Eric - -------------------------------------------------- Eric "Sparks" Christensen sparks@xxxxxxxxxx - sparks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2 E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1 - -------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJTmgSXAAoJEB/kgVGp2CYvqWwL+QGvjVgaqqzimEBlRBBKcuiF kEKW1iHEif10ndhj7tTgSXOfVlfhftRQWyloHMOVTZN16wQAr7qpTu7+38uWQfXt 04sCC82qxskFHUjpv+f4VkVL/LS3h7IaaV5uf0tZ367Chn9RK2ZLrolww3hw43LO sKsxabDplkVSgoDp3Unzw3JCfIMrl+GWT52QFDK14kSIizyF6QcmX1VZ3o7mTlqp Hn7D48hOGuIxhFs/tms3YwidjDz7INRkIJoBYiykcJQJeB1OSav30pfHVCO9raz6 VqW9vxJXBi/+sB1lq6wXRS0pfWMr/aeG4EOz4Coap9bWggmspDxU+ADyVy68NRNw U8Etka4JxYInppBohn5n4/nZA/hZ1pN8RrZdsIdkptvlkx6iCMpoUhGlgQP7CCFe D4XQf/xT4FjFY8rnnvuhS95JUNyWKPNmvOpdCRDY2QSS2K8bHXZtt4Yd3fW5LbyZ whIsJlaEyeSkqzWlgjGedMW9qMu3a2KIG1Eu3ufmVQ== =p/my -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
