In the license guidelines, under the "License Text" section [0], there is a bit of guidance regarding when to ask upstream to include the full text of the license or not. "Common licenses that require including their texts with all derivative works include ASL 2.0, EPL, BSD and MIT" I'm wondering what other licenses might fall under this category. For example, would "GPL+ and Artistic" also be in this list? Lots of Perl modules are licensed in this way, but they usually don't include a LICENSE file. I've found that many Perl modules simply have a sentence "This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself." In those cases, should we ask upstream to include the full License text each time? - Ken [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
