Re: umefont license

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi,

I'd like to package Ume-fonts[*]. Unfortunately, I cannot find
appropriate license name in good licenses list on the wiki. I thought it
is simple "as-is" but I cannot see such record - are my eyes just tired
or is it really missing?

‘As is’ is about liability, not rights, so it does not affect whether the licence is free / libre (thus OK for Fedora) or not.

ok; somehow I thought the "as-is" designation is used for public domain-like stuff where it isn't in public domain by the law but the author wishes it to be like public domain ... my bad

I am not familiar with Fedora packaging policy, but if we need to procrusteanate every unique permissive licence to one of the ‘Good licenses’ [0] for reference purpose, then ‘CopyrightOnly’ [1] seems to fit best, but not ideally.

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:CopyrightOnly

in this case, it doesn't even request the copyright notice ... but if this one is usable as an approximation, I'd happily go with that as we're going to refer to the author/source anyways

K.

--
Karel Volný
QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
Red Hat Czech, Brno
tel. +420 532294274
(RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074)
xmpp kavol@xxxxxxxxx
:: "Never attribute to malice what can
::  easily be explained by stupidity."
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux