Re: Is this reference to rpmfusion OK?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/03/14 15:42, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:40:13 -0400,
   Adam Saunders <adam.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The command line installation instructions for the patent-encumbered
Z-Push and notes about RPMFusion don't seem to me to be much of an
issue, given the above policy. The instructions state explicitly that
the package is not part of Fedora due to patent restrictions, and
notes that RPMFusion is located on servers in Europe; the language
implies that Z-Push may not be patent-encumbered in at least some
parts of Europe: "Z-Push is not available in Fedora, because Exchange
ActiveSync is patented by Microsoft in several regions including the
United States. Software which is legally encumbered, cannot be
included in Fedora, because it conflicts with our foundations. But
Z-Push is available in RPM Fusion, a third party repository legally
located in Europe."

Thanks for looking at it.
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
Does the small issue of contributory infringement not apply here ?

Regards,

Tristan

--
Tristan Santore BSc MBCS
TS4523-RIPE
Network and Infrastructure Operations
InterNexusConnect
Mobile +44-78-55069812
Tristan.Santore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Former Thawte Notary
(Please note: Thawte has closed its WoT programme down,
and I am therefore no longer able to accredit trust)

For Fedora related issues, please email me at:
TSantore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux