On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 05:06:01AM +0100, Lars Seipel wrote: >> And there are no shady backroom deals involved that might grant rights >> to Fedora that do not necessarily apply to Fedora's downstreams? > > There are no backroom deals, shady or otherwise. We don't do things > like that. To back that up, if there was a backroom deal such as you suggested where downstream rights were not retained, that would mean users would need to agree to some sort of end-user agreement before the functionality was accessible to them. It would go counter to how Fedora is distributed and counter to the norms of our community. There is no such agreement required or being asked for in this situation. >> I certainly wouldn't have felt the need to ask something like this a few >> years ago, but nowadays I guess everything is possible. > > Lars, I'm curious. What has happened that has made you lose trust? I read that more as "the world continues to go insane" rather than losing specific trust in Fedora as a project. Though if it is specifically Fedora, I wonder as well. josh _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
