Re: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:39 AM,  <aconcernedfossdev@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating
> the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?
> He is also violating the license grant, Courts would not be fooled by his
> scheme to prevent redistribution.
>
> The license grant the Linux Kernel is distributed under disallows the
> imposition of additional terms. The making of an understanding that the
> derivative work must not be redistributed (lest there be retaliation) is the
> imposition of an additional term. The communication of this threat is the
> moment that GRSecurity violates the license grant. Thence-forth
> modification, making of derivative works, and distribution of such is a
> violation of the Copyright statute. The concoction of the transparent scheme
> shows that it is a willful violation, one taken in full knowledge by
> GRSecurity of the intention of the original grantor.
>
>
> Why does not one person here care?
> Just want to forget what holds Libre Software together and go the way of
> BSD?
>
>
> (Note: last month the GRSecurity Team removed the public testing patch,
> they prevent the distribution of the patch by paying customers by a
> threat of no further business: they have concocted a transparent scheme
> to make sure the intention of the Linux rights-holders (thousands of
> entities) are defeated) (This is unlike RedHat who do distribute their
> patches in the form the rights-holders prefer: source code, RedHat does
> not attempt to stymie the redistribution of their derivative works,
> GRSecurity does.).
>

Okay, I'll bite. Fedora, as a matter of policy, only ships one kernel
variant, the upstream kernel. We have never used the PaX/grsec
patchset as it is fundamentally incompatible with other security
mechanisms we use in Fedora and breaks userspace without concern. So,
the whole matter of what PaX/grsec do is pretty much irrelevant to
Fedora because we never shipped it.

I'm sure there are people who are concerned about this matter, but as
a project, Fedora is not really involved in that mess.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux