Re: Does Bodhi need to be covered by the FPCA?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/28/2017 12:23 PM, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Broader question which I only bring up since I have the opportunity
>> do we really need the FPCA anymore for anything?
> 
> There is the "default" license selection in there, which I personally
> think is still valuable for things like spec files and other
> miscellaneous non-explicitly-licensed contributions.

Yeah. I think it is still useful for wiki content and spec files, at a
minimum.

~tom

==
Red Hat
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux