On 06/23/2018 11:57 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 23.6.2018 23:47, Till Hofmann wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm considering to package netperf [1]. The license seems to be a custom >> HP license, but it is similar to BSD. I've attached the license text, >> which you can also find in the netperf repository [2]. >> >> Is this license suitable for Fedora? If so, what should the license >> tag be? > > The "for non-commercial purposes only" part in the license raises a red > flag. So I would say no (I'm not a representative of Fedora Legal, juts > my opinion). > Thanks for the feedback. Although the restriction "for non-commercial purposes only" is only on distributing the software and documentation and not on using it, I guess it is still a no-go? And I assume this also holds for COPR? My goal is to package flent, which is also distributed by Debian (https://packages.debian.org/sid/flent), but it's not really of any use without netperf. Kind regards, Till _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/WOYRURWFZNZ3M7JI3M322JCWBW7CMVIG/
