Greetings! I recently opened a pull request against the rpick package to change the license field to include all the licenses of all its components[0]. I did this because of this text from the licensing guidelines[1]: > The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the > binary rpm. Since rpick is statically linked (it's a Rust program), it contains contents of many libraries that have a variety of licenses. Is it correct then to list all the licenses of the libraries in the license field, as proposed in the pull request? [0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpick/pull-request/1 [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License:_field
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
