Ah yes, the most confusingly named license we have at the moment. 0BSD is not actually in the BSD family, it is an MIT variant. Since it is notably more permissive and simple than MIT (and to play nice with SPDX), I've added it to the list as 0BSD.
Thanks,
Tom
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:59 AM Artem Tim <atim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello. The project using 0BSD license but it not listed in Fedora
license list. Can you help to solve this issue please? Here is a review
on RHBZ:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769070#c1
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
