Re: Is OpenSpades content license acceptable for COPR?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It hasn't changed. I don't know where Miro was going with his comment.

On 20 November 2017 at 08:14, Jared K. Smith <jsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I also forgot we are talking about Copr here, which doesn't have to comply
>> with all the Fedora packaging guidelines.
>
>
> Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that
> packages in COPR still have to comply with the Fedora packaging requirements
> which pertain to copyright/trademark/patent/trade secrets.  Or has that
> changed and I didn't notice?!?
>
> --
> Jared Smith
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux