On 08/21/2018 10:30 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > Hi, > > I've been looking at incorporating the llvm test-suite[1] into the Fedora > CI testing for the clang package. The test suite is a collection of source > code under several different licenses. One of the licenses > (Aladdin Free Public License)[2] is on the 'Bad License' list[3]. > Does the 'Bad License' list apply only to code we package or does > it apply even to something we might use only of testing purposes. It applies to code we distribute. This includes tests, if they're in the SRPM. As far as code that is purely in our CI suite, I feel that we would want our licensing standards to apply there as well. The particular license has a non-commercial use clause, and it is unclear if the author would consider use in Fedora's CI (since that is owned/operated by Red Hat) as commercial use. My understanding was ghostscript no longer uses this license, so the Malloc Benchmark Suite fork must be rather old (and git confirms that this code dates back to 2003). Current ghostscript is under the AGPL, I feel strongly it would be worth the effort to migrate this benchmark to the newer gs code. ~tom _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/HYV3FRVO7ZBLAP6UBNXVY6BZSYP6GOOK/
