Re: Ocaml documentation license

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/31/2017 04:53 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Should Fedora distribute content under the Ocaml documentation license?
> 
> The license says:
> 
> “
> The present documentation is copyright © 2013 Institut National de
> Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (INRIA).  The OCaml
> documentation and user’s manual may be reproduced and distributed in
> whole or in part, subject to the following conditions:
> 
>   • The copyright notice above and this permission notice must be
> preserved complete on all complete or partial copies.
>   • Any translation or derivative work of the OCaml documentation and
> user’s manual must be approved by the authors in writing before
> distribution.
>   • If you distribute the OCaml documentation and user’s manual in part,
> instructions for obtaining the complete version of this manual must be
> included, and a means for obtaining a complete version provided.
>   • Small portions may be reproduced as illustrations for reviews or
> quotes in other works without this permission notice if proper citation
> is given.
> ”
> 
> For program source code, this would clearly not be allowed because
> derivative works are not permitted.  Are such restrictions permitted for
> documentation licenses in Fedora?

No. The restrictions upon modification make this non-free, and we have
never permitted non-free documentation in Fedora.

~tom
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux