On 12/5/18 3:57 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Please clarify what "violates any rules or guidelines of the Fedora > Project" [1] means. > > My understanding that this does NOT mean all the Fedora Packaging > Guidelines and Update guidelines, since that would defeat the purpose > of copr to a large extent. In other words, I assume that packages > in copr cannot contain "bad" content, but it can be packaged in > arbitrary ways. The text can be read both ways. > > This in context of discussion on fedora-devel [2]. > As shown by that thread, people have contradictory explanations > so some clarification is needed. > > My suggestion would be to strike point e. from the list. > > [1] https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#what-i-can-build-in-copr > [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/LPMJQ6H7HYU4MDKZWOI4YCXHH24ZOTS7/ Here are some definitions: Good: Package meets all Fedora Packaging Guidelines && Package has no Legal issues Bad: Package has Legal Issues, may or may not meet the remainder of Fedora Packaging Guidelines Ugly: Package does not have Legal Issues, does not meet Fedora Packaging Guidelines You may put "Good" and "Ugly" packages in a Copr. You may put "Good" packages into Fedora. You cannot put "Bad" packages in either. hth, ~tom _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
