Re: GPLv2+ vs GPLv3+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/04/2017 05:40 PM, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Well, there's really no GPLv2 only code, it's all GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+, so I decided to accept the GPLv3+ from the packager.
> 
> Thanks for the help.
> 
> Mattia


COPYING file looks reporting GPLv2 license.
If the software is licensed under GPLv2, you can't report GPLv3+ license
only with License tag.

-- 
--
Antonio Trande
sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org
See my vCard.
begin:vcard
fn:Antonio Trande
n:Trande;Antonio
org:Fedora Project
adr:;;https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter;;;;Italy
email;internet:sagitter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
note;quoted-printable:GPG Key: 0xD5C73C16131EEDF8948AA719C05E8F07B96A706C=0D=0A=
	Check GPG keys on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/.
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux