Re: fedora packaging: Inclusion of license(s) in fedora packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: fedora packaging: Inclusion of license(s) in fedora packages
From: Siddharth Sharma <siddharth.kde@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 00:00:38 +0530
Authentication-results: bastion01.phx2.fedoraproject.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="VL0/m40S"
Cc: legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1ec868ad-bb8b-fa3b-34ff-37af4c71615d@redhat.com>
References: <CAPLf90w7+ZgrQWUnQCTK0EYF146tpE814ZJv3Mp=kvnv76sGFA@mail.gmail.com> <1ec868ad-bb8b-fa3b-34ff-37af4c71615d@redhat.com>

Thank you

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Prev by Date: Re: fedora packaging: Inclusion of license(s) in fedora packages
Next by Date: Re: Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention?
Previous by thread: Re: fedora packaging: Inclusion of license(s) in fedora packages
Next by thread: any blockers for mjpeg based applications?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Gnome Users] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux