Hi Dalibor, [It seems the fedora legal list somehow dropped your response, so keeping on CC.] On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 10:31 +0200, dalibor topic wrote: > the issue has been marked as resolved. Thanks. Apparently some legal issues do indeed take years to resolve :) But nice to see the license text being clarified now. > After downloading 8u131 demos and samples from > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk8-downloads-2133151.html > I took a quick look at some of files and they seemed fixed. Yes I couldn't find the "nuclear facility" clause anywhere anymore in http://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/jdk/8u131-b11-demos/d54c1d3a095b4ff2b6607d096fa80163/jdk-8u131-linux-x64-demos.tar.gz And the "Oracle BSD License" now seems to simply be the standard BSD license without any extra terms. Do note that there are still files (all under sample/jnlp/ except for the GNUmakefile) that refer to SUN in the disclaimer text (instead of ORACLE or leaving the company name out). But I assume that is fine. Thanks, Mark > cheers, > dalibor topic > > On 18.11.2013 18:55, Dalibor Topic wrote: > > On 11/13/13 5:39 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > >> On 11/13/13 10:37 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I added Dalibor from Oracle to the CC, who has been helpful cleaning up > >>> some license issues around java in the past. > >> > >> As Tom said [0], filing a bug in the bug tracker is the way to go. I'll track down > >> the owner of the file, and let you know what the bug ID is once I've done that. > > > > I filed an issue, it's available at https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028538 . > > > > cheers, > > dalibor topic > > _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
