On 02/27/2018 03:03 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > As of 2001, CP/M, originally from Digital Research, was released under a > license that has been reported as open source: > > http://www.cpm.z80.de/license.html > > On the one hand, I'm concerned with the phrase "as part of the > 'Unofficial CP/M Web Site", but on the other hand, that is immediately > followed by "with its maintainers, developers and community", which > seems broadly inclusive. > > Is this license satisfactory for Fedora? My reading is that this is a permissive open source license. I would argue that Fedora, in the act of distributing the CP/M technology found on the 'Unofficial CP/M Web Site', is part of the community (as well as anyone downstream of Fedora). That said, the wording is weird, so I'm deferring to Richard. ~tom _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
