Re: Licences not listed on the Licensing wiki page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 05/17/2018 02:41 PM, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> Recently I've downloaded the primary.xml for F28 and ran a check comparing the licences of packages in the repo against good licences listed on the Licensing wiki page.
> There are a couple licences that are used by a few packages, but I couldn't find them on the wiki page. It might be good to review these licences and add them to the wiki page, or ask maintainers to change the package License: tags in case the licence is already listed, but under a different identifier.
> 
> - Array (used by gcin)

Added.

> - BSL-1.0 (used by ceph, librados2 and others)

As much as I value consistency, I am not going to cause a fuss over the
use of the SPDX identifier here.

> - Freely redistributable without restriction (used by alienarena-data, beneath-a-steel-sky and others)

This is only kosher for content, but that is how it is being used.

> - PDDL-1.0 (used by python-nibabel)

Added.

~tom
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/JJGTXM3XAOLIMMYGNLAM5AIOGFY2H3NW/




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux