Re: Adopt Debian-style 'common licenses' convention?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 11:00 -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
> Any thoughts on this idea?

I was curious about how much of a problem this really is, so I checked
on my workstation:

$ du -sch /usr/share/licenses
27M     /usr/share/licenses
27M     total

Whoah!

I liked Miro's suggestion of hardlinking the licenses, but it's
important to sure they are actually identical with checksums (i.e.,
don't just use the License field because what if the upstream project
subtly adjusted the license file?)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux