Re: twolame could we move it to Fedora ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 21:00 -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2018-01-10 13:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > On 01/10/2018 01:35 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > After move mp3 related packages to Fedora proper, we still have
> > > twolame
> > >  and kwave to move or to review .
> > > 
> > > I want focus on twolame [1] as state in [2] twolame is a MP2 (not
> > > MP3)
> > > encoder , is now eligible for a Fedora package  or not ? 
> > 
> > twolame is fine for Fedora.
> 
> Great news, Tom, thanks!
> 
> Sérgio, are you planning on proposing twolame yourself?  Once it's
> in,
> then the following packages could also use it:
> 
> * audacity (make all %{?_with_mp3} unconditional)
> * gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel,
> remove
> --disable-twolame, update %files)
> * sox (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel)
> 
> All this should be coordinated with the external repository which has
> been supporting these.

Hello , if you add twolame in Fedora , you do me a big favor, I can
help you in review if no one review package for you. 
I can coordinate the RPMFusion , but is not a big problem because we
just bump on release version in rpm spec .

Anyway while I'm typing Zamir SUN  made one package review ! 

Bye, best regards and thanks.
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux