On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 04:07:15PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > (Note: pagure can and will enforce the FPCA for dist-git) > > I know Richard Fontana has expressed some interest in reducing the need > for FPCA. Maybe this is an opportunity to move in that direction? I > know Spot has said that "License In = License Out" is adequate for > projects on Github; I think Spot's concern with spec files is that we > don't give them an explicit license (right)? > > As we're moving things, can we do something in Pagure to cover this, so > the FPCA isn't needed here? Note that pagure running at pagure.io no longer requires FPCA, I was here speaking about the pagure instance running on the top of our dist-git. Pierre _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
