On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 10:21 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > I don't see any indication that they're using Fedora, in which case > they can't be violating a license we can enforce. The entry you > highlight is a copy of the license on the Fedora wiki, but it's just > a reference. The website for the project in question is > https://sourceware.org/elfutils/ A long time ago elfutils upstream was fedorahosted.org which is probably where the confusion comes from. Also the current version of elfutils is distributed under a combination of GPLv3 and GPLv2/LGPLv3, not the OSL1.1. elfutils has used the GPL since 2006, but maybe they are embedding a really old version? You will need to make the request for sources through the company that provided you with the binaries, which I assume is ADT. If they provided you with binaries which contain elfutils, then they should also provide you with the sources. I am happy to help you obtain a copy of the sources if they are refusing your requests. Being one of the upstream authors I am certainly interested in their modifications. Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
