On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 7:54 AM Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Did you ever get a follow-up answer from them? Yes, I did. I'm terribly sorry for the delay. Other events overtook me. Upstream's answer is: Yes, of course. That is the reason for moving to the artistic license. What I am licensing is not the mathematical data itself (which i consider as unlicensable, as it is “truth”), but only the way how this data is packed. Anyone may modify this data and distribute it, as long as it does not claim to be the GAP transitive groups library. (The modified library may claim to be compatible with the GAP library, but then it is the modifiers duty to resolve this.) That sounds to me like upstream is okay with the naming restriction you suggested. I would be happier if upstream would simply strike the confusing sentence from the license file, but I suppose this will have to do. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
