On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:59:09AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 25.06.2020, 21:09 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' > Esser: > > Am Mittwoch, den 24.06.2020, 22:53 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' > > Esser: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I wanted to ask in general whether the EUPL v1.2 [1,2] is an > > > acceptable > > > license for Fedora. > > > > > > If it is acceptable, can we please list it in the wiki as a "good > > > license", please? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Björn > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32017D0863 > > > [2] https://opensource.org/licenses/EUPL-1.2 > > > > To make this a bit more precise: > > > > My question is about a package review [1]. > > > > The package is quite useful for people that have German identification > > documents and want to use online services offered by Germany's > > goverment. > > > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851205 > > > After digging on the internet a bit, I found the FSF consideres this > license to be free. [1,2] > > @spot: Can you please confirm, that this means the EUPL 1.2 license is > to be considered free by means of "good licensing" according to the > statues of the Fedora Project? This is now also blocking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868602, which we need handle ASAP for the PARSEC Change in F33. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
