Re: Batch icon set license

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 01:12:09PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:53:47PM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
> > > You are free to use Batch (the "icon set") or any part thereof (the
> > > "icons") in any personal, open-source or commercial work without
> > > obligation of payment (monetary or otherwise) or attribution. Do not
> > > sell the icon set, host the icon set or rent the icon set (either in
> > > existing or modified form).
> [...]
> > That is apparent *nonfree* licence, probably a homebrew one, so it
> > does not have any name.
> 
> I'm saying this with no particular authority, but it seems to me that
> the two conflicting statements are meant to do something similar to the
> SIL Open Font License — allow the content to be used as part of a work
> but to forbid its sale _as a thing in itself_. See the FSF's comments
> here: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#SILOFL
> 
> I'll leave it to legal to say whether they agree that that's the
> probably intent and whether it *works* like that. 

Let's not forget SunRPC:
http://spot.livejournal.com/315383.html

 Richard
 
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux