On 06/12/2017 04:44 PM, Vincent wrote: > > Good afternoon, > > I'm VincentS, a newbie on fedora packaging. I contact you about > precisions on licenses for a new package. > > Here is the log about sources licenses. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1271137 > > There is different licenses for all files. We think package license must > be GPLv2+ and MIT and CC BY-SA. > > Did I forget anything? What do you think about this? > > Thanks in advance for your reply. Well, I haven't audited the source directly, but it looks like you have a mix of interpreted code (Python) and compiled code (C++). Your compiled code is LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ and MIT. The interpreted code is GPLv2+. If they both ended up in the same package, I would say that this is fine: License: GPLv2+ and MIT and CC-BY-SA If you wish, this is also correct: License: GPLv2+ and (LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ and MIT) and CC-BY-SA ~tom _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
