On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 1:15 PM Bryan Sutula <bsutula@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > (replied earlier but it was moderated...sorry if a duplicate arrives) > > On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 14:12 +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > I'm trying to package lprint https://github.com/michaelrsweet/lprint > > which has Apache Software License 2.0 with exceptions for GPLv2 and > > LGPLv2. > > [...] > > > Unfortunately, there isn't a valid short name for 'ASL 2.0 with > > exceptions' at [2] - would it be possible to add the short name into > > the table or should I just use simple 'ASL 2.0'? > > The question of what to name this exception aside, the lprint NOTICE > text is only a portion of the LLVM-exception text[3]. The lprint text > is awkward in that the first word of the exception is "Additionally" > but there's no prior exception text in the lprint NOTICE file for the > "Additionally" to refer to. I wonder whether the author might be > willing to avoid creating yet another custom exception type, by > including the entire LLVM-exception text in the lprint NOTICE file. Ah, I completely missed that. I suppose it shows that the LLVM exception is not really suitable as a general-purpose (not compiler-specific) exception. Richard _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
