IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-23
- From: Scott Hollenbeck via Datatracker
- Re: Pecka Kucha videos available
- Pecka Kucha videos available
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-wish-whip-09
- From: Russ Housley via Datatracker
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Filleted clients [Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society]
- Filleted clients [Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society]
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: very secret, was Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Datatracker persons page and tracking role history (was: Re: [117attendees] Perks for chairs (Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable))
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Fwd: [CS Academic] Conference hotel scam (travellerpoint.org)
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- IETF 117 follow-up questions (Was: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable)
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Fwd: [CS Academic] Conference hotel scam (travellerpoint.org)
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Meeting frequeney (was: Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable)
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Meeting frequeney (was: Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable)
- From: Loganaden Velvindron
- Re: Meeting frequeney (was: Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable)
- Re: [117attendees] Meeting frequeney (was: Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable)
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: more than back doors, Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: more than back doors, Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: more than back doors, Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: more than back doors, Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- RE: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- RE: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [Last-Call] [Wish] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-wish-whip-09
- From: Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: Broken CSAM proposal [Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society]
- From: Giovane C. M. Moura
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Meeting frequeney (was: Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable)
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Meeting frequeney (was: Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable)
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-02
- Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-02
- Re: Perks for chairs (Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable)
- Re: [117attendees] Meeting frequeney (was: Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable)
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Meeting frequeney (was: Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable)
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Jul 30 06:00:01 2023
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- From: Kaliya Identity Woman
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-templin-intarea-ipid-ext-00.txt
- Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-templin-intarea-ipid-ext-00.txt
- From: touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-templin-intarea-ipid-ext-00.txt
- From: touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-wish-whip-09
- From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker
- Re: very secret, was Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- FW: I-D Action: draft-templin-intarea-ipid-ext-00.txt
- From: Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- RE: [EXTERNAL] [117attendees] Perks for chairs (Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable)
- Re: [Last-Call] [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- Re: very secret, was Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- RE: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-bier-bfd-03
- [Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-bier-bfd-03
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-08
- From: Jean-Michel Combes via Datatracker
- Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Perks for chairs (Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable)
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Broken CSAM proposal [Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society]
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- From: jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- From: Kaliya Identity Woman
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- From: jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- [Last-Call] Fwd: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-23
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- From: jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-uuidrev-rfc4122bis-08
- From: Kyzer Davis (kydavis)
- Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- From: jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable
- From: jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable
- FW: I-D Action: draft-templin-intarea-ipv4-idext-00.txt
- From: Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable
- From: Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Thank you to Nokia
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- From: Giovane C. M. Moura
- Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Making meeting attendance more affordable
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Meetecho and in-person meetings
- [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-uuidrev-rfc4122bis-08
- From: Florian Obser via Datatracker
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-14
- From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexe-yang-cm-02
- From: Shuping Peng via Datatracker
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Meetecho and in-person meetings
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13
- From: Liushucheng (Will LIU, Strategy & Industry Development)
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13
- [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13
- From: Will LIU via Datatracker
- Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
- Re: [Last-Call] [DNSOP] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-02
- Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-02
- [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-02
- From: Nicolai Leymann via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-21
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-21
- Re: [Last-Call] [Teas] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-21
- From: mohamed . boucadair
- Re: [Last-Call] [Teas] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-21
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-21
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-21
- From: mohamed . boucadair
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Jul 23 06:00:01 2023
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: [Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-20
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-05
- From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-21
- From: Dirk Von Hugo via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-pbb-evpn-isid-cmacflush-08
- From: Klaas Wierenga via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-14
- Final IETF 117 HotRFC Talk Solicitation
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-14
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: [Last-Call] [Teas] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: [Last-Call] [Tsv-art] [Teas] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: [Last-Call] [Teas] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- From: mohamed . boucadair
- Re: Appeal of current Guidance on in-Person and Online meetings
- Re: Appeal of current Guidance on in-Person and Online meetings
- [Last-Call] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-20
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Appeal of current Guidance on in-Person and Online meetings
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- From: Bob Briscoe via Datatracker
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- From: Brian Haberman via Datatracker
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- RE: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- From: mohamed . boucadair
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]
- From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-gutmann-testkeys-04
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-14
- From: Stephen Farrell via Datatracker
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- Re: QR Code data transfer protocol?
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- QR Code data transfer protocol?
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-gutmann-testkeys-04
- From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-21
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Jul 16 06:00:01 2023
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Second IETF 117 HotRFC Talk Solicitation
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bier-evpn-08
- From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr-06
- From: Valery Smyslov via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-09
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-09
- From: Dirk Von Hugo via Datatracker
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- RE: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- From: Rich Salz via Datatracker
- Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach
- Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-14
- Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-14
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-05
- From: Sean Turner via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-11
- From: Peter Yee via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr-05
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-14
- [Last-Call] Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-08
- From: David Lawrence via Datatracker
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr-05
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-probe-attribution-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Wrapping up: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-08.txt> (Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps with additional information) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr-05
- From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-10
- From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [Last-Call] [nvo3] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-11
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-10
- From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsec-probe-attribution-08
- From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bier-ospfv3-extensions-07
- From: Mallory Knodel via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-probe-attribution-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-21
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-10
- From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-21
- From: Reese Enghardt via Datatracker
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-22
- Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-22
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- RE: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-11
- From: Carl Wallace via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-22
- From: Anthony Somerset via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] [nvo3] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-11
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-11
- From: Sheng Jiang via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- [Last-Call] Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-acme-integrations-16
- From: Ted Lemon via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-privacypass-auth-scheme-11
- From: Yingzhen Qu via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bier-evpn-08
- From: Ron Bonica via Datatracker
- Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- Re: [Last-Call] [spring] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment-15
- RE: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews]
- From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [117attendees] San Francisco and IETF 117
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-17
- San Francisco and IETF 117
- Re: [Last-Call] [nvo3] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-11
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Jul 9 06:00:01 2023
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- From: Shawn Emery via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-11
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-privacypass-auth-scheme-11
- From: Gyan Mishra via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-20
- Re: Rivest's S-Expressions I-D no longer found
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-20
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-gutmann-testkeys-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-20
- Re: NomCom 2023 Update on Volunteers
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-17
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-17
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-07
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 117 Standard Registration Ending Soon & Additional Social Tickets Available
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 117 Standard Registration Ending Soon & Additional Social Tickets Available
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 117 Standard Registration Ending Soon & Additional Social Tickets Available
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 117 Standard Registration Ending Soon & Additional Social Tickets Available
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 117 Standard Registration Ending Soon & Additional Social Tickets Available
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 117 Standard Registration Ending Soon & Additional Social Tickets Available
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 117 Standard Registration Ending Soon & Additional Social Tickets Available
- IETF 117 Standard Registration Ending Soon & Additional Social Tickets Available
- Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-07
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-10
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-20
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-20
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-20
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-17
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-gutmann-testkeys-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-20
- Re: NomCom 2023 Update on Volunteers
- [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-13
- From: Vladimír Čunát via Datatracker
- Re: [117attendees] IETF 117 HotRFC Talk Solicitation
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-gutmann-testkeys-04
- Re: [Last-Call] [Sedate] Wrapping up: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-08.txt> (Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps with additional information) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-gutmann-testkeys-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- IETF 117 HotRFC Talk Solicitation
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-10
- From: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia)
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
- From: Behcet Sarikaya via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-gutmann-testkeys-04
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-17
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-26
- From: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-17
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-17
- Re: [Last-Call] Wrapping up: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-08.txt> (Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps with additional information) to Proposed Standard
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: [Last-Call] Last call comments on draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-08
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-17
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: [Last-Call] [dnsdir] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-04
- Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-gutmann-testkeys-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-pbb-evpn-isid-cmacflush-07
- From: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia)
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment-15
- From: Mohit Sethi via Datatracker
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- RE: RFC 8252
- RE: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-08.txt> (Path Segment in MPLS Based Segment Routing Network) to Proposed Standard
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-17
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-gutmann-testkeys-04
- From: Melinda Shore via Datatracker
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: [Last-Call] [nvo3] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-10
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr-05
- From: Valery Smyslov via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [nvo3] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-10
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-07
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-07
- Re: [Last-Call] [nvo3] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-10
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-07
- Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-probe-attribution
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-26
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-26
- From: Russ Mundy via Datatracker
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-17
- From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-07
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-07
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-04
- From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-10
- From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [DNSOP] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-03
- RE: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-10
- From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries-08
- From: Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Jul 2 06:00:01 2023
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-10
- From: Menachem Dodge via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-16
- [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-04
- From: Tim Wicinski via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-04
- IETF 117 Final Agenda
- [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-04
- From: John Levine via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-pbb-evpn-isid-cmacflush-07
- From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-10
- From: Russ Housley via Datatracker
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- RE: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-probe-attribution-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-03
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: AD review delays
- Re: AD review delays
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: What to do duringRe: AD review delays
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: What to do duringRe: AD review delays
- Re: What to do duringRe: AD review delays
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-26
- Re: [Last-Call] [Lsr] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-14
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: AD review delays
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: AD review delays
- Re: AD review delays
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: RFC 8252
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: RFC 8252
- Re: RFC 8252
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: RFC 8252
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-26
- From: Carlos Bernardos via Datatracker
- RE: AD review delays
- Re: [Last-Call] [Lsr] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-14
- [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries-08.txt> (Updating the NTP Registries) to Proposed Standard
- [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-14
- From: Petr Špaček via Datatracker
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-14
- From: Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-14
- Re: AD review delays
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-22
- Re: RFC 8252 is a complete joke
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]