Russ, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Jun 30, 2023, at 18:33, Russ Housley via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review result: Almost Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-10 > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review Date: 2023-06-30 > IETF LC End Date: 2023-07-12 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > > Summary: Almost Ready > > > Major Concerns: None. > > > Minor Concerns: > > Section 2.2: Please provide more discussion of "central authority". I > do not think that a Internet-wide authority is required to meet this > requirement. I think that the authority needs to be recognized > throughout a provider network. > > > Nits: > > Section 1: please avoid splitting "I/S-PMSI" across multiple lines. > > Section 2: s/ingress PE's default label space/default label space/ > > Section 2: s/packet's ingress PE/ingress PE of the packet/ > > Section 2.2.2.1: s/Route-2 respectively/Route-2, respectively/ > > Section 3.2: s/PTA's Label field/label field of the PTA/ > > Section 3.2: s/source PE's label space/label space of the source PE/ > > Section 4: s/third party's label space/label space of a third party/ (2 places) > > Section 4: please spell out "LFIBs"; this term is not in the definitions. > > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
