Hiya, On 15/10/2023 21:44, Carsten Bormann wrote:
you are also wasting a lot of time here on the list
FWIW, I don't agree with the above. I think this discussion rather highlights a difference between those who (I think) have a more utilitarian view of IETF lists vs. those (e.g. me) who think there's an important community building part of IETF list discussion. I imagine the former opinion leads one to be more pernickity/strict about what's a good or bad list message, whereas the latter (my own position) is that we should allow much more leeway(*) even if that comes at the cost of an occasional ridiculous thread. (Like this one, for which I'm partly at fault:-) S. (*) I do not mean allowing rudeness or other agreed bad practices.
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
