Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Disclaimer: I’m also very specifically part of the (mostly silent) consensus that has supported receiving these weekly messages
> since 2006, with a gap until JohnL filled it again. Thank you!
If there is consensus here, then let's have a draft. It's ok if my view loses there, but it's not ok to insist there is consensus without going through the process.
The reason I don't like it is because I find mixing bot traffic with human messages a bit abusive. There is no increased transparency, either. The messages are all public. It's pretty easy to see that someone is posting too much or getting in a flame war.
thanks,
Rob
