Dan, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this document based on my own review. Lars > On Jul 26, 2023, at 10:15, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. > > Document: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-14 > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review Date: 2023-07-25 > IETF LC End Date: 2023-08-01 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > 1. As SD-WAN is not an IETF work item, it needs to be better defined, possibly > by reference. To understand the concept one needs to go to documents external > to the IETF such as [MEF70.1]. If that is the authoritative reference (or > there) it should be mentioned in the Introduction section. > > 2. Section 3.1.2 > >> The client interface of SD-WAN edges can be IP or Ethernet-based. > > We need a definition or reference (IEEE 802.3 or MEF) of what is meant by > 'Ethernet-based'. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > In 4.2 and 6.2.1 MEF70.1 needs to be between brackets (Informational Reference) > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
