Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-nvme-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Roni,

> Nits/editorial comments:
> THe security section has normative language “SHOULD NOT be deployed” in two
> paragraphs. Is there a reason for SHOULD NOT and not “MUST NOT”. I hope the
> security review will mention it since I am not a security expert

I'm fine with replacing

"NFS with an NVMe layout SHOULD NOT be deployed."

with

"NFS with an NVMe layout MUST NOT be deployed."

and similar for the second occurance.

to make a cleared statement.  But in the end it's an administrative
decision, and not enforcable.

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux