Re: [Last-Call] [DNSOP] [Ext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > definition which was objected to by multiple IESG members.
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-integrations/ballot/
    > (in RFC-editor Q, on missref)

    > So, if you didn't like that definition before, then probably you should
    > object to RFC8499bis keeping it.

Ted's original review that lead to this:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/Ev83RjCbQcC64paenZXJawKxu9k/


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux