Re: [Last-Call] [DNSOP] [Ext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I would say that if the WG didn't think it was important at the time by
forgetting it, it probably is not an "important term", and I can see
this not being fixed in an IETF LC anymore as an acceptable outcome.

Sure, if I'm in the rough that's fine.

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux