Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks, Shivan.

> From reading the Security Considerations of RFC 8966 (last para), it
> seems that geolocation privacy was a concern with the original Babel
> spec. Allowing extremely-fine-grained (1 microsecond) RTT measurements
> makes that infinitely worse, especially for users on mobile or behind
> VPNs, who typically have special privacy needs.

I agree.  I'll add some wording to that effect to the Security Considerations.

> The IETF has thought a lot about privacy concerns with RTT measurement and how
> to balance them with operational needs,

I'll be grateful for a reference.

Thanks again,

-- Juliusz

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux