Re: [Last-Call] [Extra] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-extra-jmapaccess-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




-----Original Message-----
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: October 19, 2023 10:05 AM
To: Daniel Migault via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: secdir@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-extra-jmapaccess.all@xxxxxxxx; extra@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx; Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-extra-jmapaccess-04

Arnt Gulbrandsen writes:
> The two each do their own authentication. What JMAPACCESS says is that 
> based on the IMAP authentication performed by the client, it's clear 
> that if the client has JMAP client capability, then it's also able 
> authenticate via JMAP and will in that case have access to the same 
> mail and mailboxes.

Maybe I should extend one of the examples to include JMAP authentication...

<mglt>
Or simply say that the client authenticates itself to the JMAP server - just to make it clear it cannot access JMAP based on the authentication performed on the IMAP server.
</mglt>

Arnt
-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux