Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Currently, only two registries are given full references: >> [...] > > I think adding such references for every mentioned registry would be > somewhat unworkable for very little return. Yes, it seems like that to me, too. But is there a reason that two registries are mentioned as full references? Dale -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
