On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 10:28:42PM +0100, Job Snijders wrote: > > The size bound on the ROAIPAddress is a good enhancement. But in RFC > > 6482, there was an element explicitly defined called IPAddress which > > was defined as a BIT STRING. But in this draft, I find no element > > named IPAddress, and I’m concerned with the fact that the text in Sec. > > 4.3.1 refers to IPAddress. > > Ah, I see what you mean! The IPAddress Type is defined in section > 2.2.3.8 of RFC 3779 (which is referenced in the next section, section > 4.3.2.1 of draft-ietf-sidrops-rfc6482bis-07) > > At the time of writing 4.3.2 was intended as a high level introduction, > with each subsection providing more technical detail. > > Do you have suggestions to adhere to the princple 'explain on first use'? > (which I assume you are after?) I came up with the following re-ordering of text following your feedback, does this seem better to you? https://github.com/job/draft-rfc6482bis/commit/3f824b69633a83497236892267f2ab5c8ca693aa Kind regards, Job -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
