IETF Discussion

Date Index

[Prev Page][Next Page]

Re: [art] A very late suggestion (was; Re: Back from leave), (continued)
Call for Nominations: 2018 Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP), Matthew Ford
- Re: Call for Nominations: 2018 Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP), Matthew Ford
should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?, Michael Richardson
- Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?, Martin Thomson
  - Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?, Michael Richardson
    - Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?, Martin Thomson
- Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?, Patrick McManus
  - Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?, Toerless Eckert
    - Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?, Patrick McManus
      - Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?, Toerless Eckert
        
        Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?, Patrick McManus
        
        Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?, Toerless Eckert
- Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?, Lloyd Wood
  - Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?, Eliot Lear
    - Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?, Michael Richardson
Sign-up for PechaKucha presenters at IETF-100, Aaron Falk
Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-voucher-05, Russ Housley
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-voucher-05, Kent Watsen
  - Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-voucher-05, Toerless Eckert
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-uta-email-deep-09.txt>, Marcus Bointon
WebMeeting on IETF Outreach and Local Communities: Oct 18 2pm - 4pm EDT, Alia Atlas
Re: End Work on IPv4, R. Atkinson
- Re: End Work on IPv4, Nick Hilliard
- Re: End Work on IPv4, Toerless Eckert
  - Re: End Work on IPv4, Phillip Hallam-Baker
  - Re: End Work on IPv4, Joe Touch
  - Re: End Work on IPv4, R. Atkinson
- Re: End Work on IPv4, Randy Bush
- Re: End Work on IPv4, Joe Touch
  - Message not available
    - Re: End Work on IPv4, Tim Chown
      - Re: End Work on IPv4, Joe Touch
        
        Re: End Work on IPv4, Toerless Eckert
        
        Re: End Work on IPv4, Joe Touch
Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15, Adam Montville
Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Stephen Farrell
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Phillip Hallam-Baker
  - Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Tom Herbert
    - Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), stephen . farrell
      - Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Tom Herbert
        
        RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Padmadevi Pillay Esnault
      - RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Alexander Clemm
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Dino Farinacci
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Robert Moskowitz
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Christian Huitema
        
        Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Padma Pillay-Esnault
        
        RE: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Alexander Clemm
        
        Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Christian Huitema
        
        Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Dino Farinacci
        
        Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Eric Rescorla
        
        Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Dino Farinacci
        
        Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Eric Rescorla
        
        Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Dino Farinacci
        
        Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Eric Rescorla
        
        Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Dino Farinacci
        
        Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Randy Bush
        
        Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Christian Huitema
        
        Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Dino Farinacci
        
        Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Toerless Eckert
        
        Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Tom Herbert
        
        Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Toerless Eckert
        
        Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Tom Herbert
        
        Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), John C Klensin
        
        Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Toerless Eckert
        
        Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Sam Sun
        
        Message not available
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Tom Herbert
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Dino Farinacci
        
        RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Uma Chunduri
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Joel M. Halpern
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Leif Johansson
        
        RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Alexander Clemm
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Leif Johansson
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), John C Klensin
  - Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Mike StJohns
    - Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Eggert, Lars
  - Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Jari Arkko
    - RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Uma Chunduri
      - Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Joel M. Halpern
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Benjamin Kaduk
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Joel Halpern Direct
        
        RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Uma Chunduri
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Joel M. Halpern
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Padma Pillay-Esnault
        
        RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Uma Chunduri
        
        RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Georgios Karagiannis
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Padma Pillay-Esnault
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Stephen Farrell
        
        RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Uma Chunduri
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Padma Pillay-Esnault
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Randy Bush
        
        RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Georgios Karagiannis
        
        RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Uma Chunduri
        
        RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Uma Chunduri
    - Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Robert Moskowitz
  - Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Stephen Farrell
    - RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Uma Chunduri
      - Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Randy Bush
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fwd: Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Christian Huitema
  - Re: Fwd: Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Joe Touch
  - Re: Fwd: Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Erik Nordmark
    - Re: Fwd: Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), S Moonesamy
  - Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Padma Pillay-Esnault
    - Message not available
      - Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), S Moonesamy
        
        Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Padma Pillay-Esnault
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), S Moonesamy
        
        Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Padma Pillay-Esnault
        
        RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Uma Chunduri
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Tom Herbert
        
        RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Alexander Clemm
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Alvaro Retana
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Randy Bush
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Eggert, Lars
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Randy Bush
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Jeff Tantsura
        
        Message not available
        
        RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), S Moonesamy
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Robert Moskowitz
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Tom Herbert
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Padma Pillay-Esnault
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Melinda Shore
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Robert Moskowitz
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Robert Moskowitz
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Robert Moskowitz
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Christian Huitema
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Padma Pillay-Esnault
        
        Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas), Padma Pillay-Esnault
Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Elwyn Davies
- Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Vishnu Pavan Beeram
  - Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Lou Berger
    - Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Vishnu Pavan Beeram
      - Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Lou Berger
        
        Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Vishnu Pavan Beeram
        
        Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Elwyn Davies
        
        Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Vishnu Pavan Beeram
        
        Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Considerations Considerations Section, Dave Cridland
- Re: Considerations Considerations Section, Ted Lemon
- Re: Considerations Considerations Section, Dave Aronson
- Re: Considerations Considerations Section, Phillip Hallam-Baker
  - Re: Considerations Considerations Section, Dave Cridland
    - RE: Considerations Considerations Section, Mehmet Ersue
      - Re: Considerations Considerations Section, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Considerations Considerations Section, Michael Richardson
      - Re: Considerations Considerations Section, Miles Fidelman
      - Re: Considerations Considerations Section, Mark Nottingham
  - Re: Considerations Considerations Section, Toerless Eckert
ISOC Against its Own Principles: Acting as a Censor, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: ISOC Against its Own Principles: Acting as a Censor, Brian E Carpenter
  - Re: ISOC Against its Own Principles: Acting as a Censor, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5280-i18n-update-03, Joel Halpern
Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-25, Christian Huitema
- Re: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-25 - motivation, Joel M. Halpern
  - RE: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-25 - motivation, Adrian Farrel
Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-05, Brian Weis
- Re: [v6ops] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-05, Tommy Pauly
  - Re: [v6ops] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-05, Brian Weis (bew)
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon
  - Re: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Denis Ovsienko
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Lee Howard
  - RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Adrian Farrel
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Loganaden Velvindron
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Loganaden Velvindron
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker
  - Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Lee Howard
    - Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Andrew G. Malis
    - Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Stewart Bryant
      - Re: [sunset4] s'wonderful or not, Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, John Levine
        
        Re: [sunset4] s'wonderful or not, Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush
        
        Re: [sunset4] s'wonderful or not, Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Eric C Rosen
        
        Re: [sunset4] s'wonderful or not, Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Joe Touch
    - Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, David Farmer
    - Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      - Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Stewart Bryant
        
        Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker
    - Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Stewart Bryant
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Stephane Bortzmeyer
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Adrian Farrel
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Denis Ovsienko
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Stephen Farrell
      - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Stephen Farrell
      - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Stewart Bryant
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush
        
        Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..], Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..], Paul Hoffman
        
        Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..], Stewart Bryant
        
        Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..], Randy Bush
        
        Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..], Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..], Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..], Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..], Toerless Eckert
        
        Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..], Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..], Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..], Toerless Eckert
        
        Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..], Joe Touch
        
        Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..], Stuart Cheshire
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Stewart Bryant
      - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, lloyd . wood
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Brian E Carpenter
  - RE: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Jacques Latour
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Joe Touch
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Brian E Carpenter
      - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard, Abdussalam Baryun
Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-06, Susan Hares
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained-04.txt> (Service Models Explained) to Informational RFC, Warren Kumari
Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-02, Jan Lindblad
- Re: Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-02, Kamran Raza (skraza)
Secdir last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-05, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- RE: Secdir last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-05, Qin Wu
Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06, Roni Even
- RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06, stephane.litkowski
NomCom 2017-2018: Current slate of nominees, NomCom Chair 2017
Hackathon room and sponsorship secured, more projects and participants needed, Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-cubic-06, Sean Turner
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-cubic-06, Mirja Kühlewind
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-curdle-pkix-06.txt> (Algorithm Identifiers for Ed25519, Ed448, X25519 and X448 for use in the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure) to Internet Standard, Russ Housley
Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom, NomCom Chair 2017
- Re: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom, Stewart Bryant
  - Re: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom, Loa Andersson
    - Re: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom, Mary B
      - Re: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom, Stewart Bryant
        
        Re: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom, Mary B
        
        RE: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom, Eric Gray
        
        Re: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom, Mary B
        
        Re: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom, Stewart Bryant
        
        RE: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom, Adrian Farrel
        
        Re: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom, Loa Andersson
      - Re: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom, Michael StJohns
Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-session-culling-04, Paul Wouters
- Re: [GROW] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-session-culling-04, Will Hargrave
  - Re: [GROW] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-session-culling-04, Job Snijders
Intdir early review of draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider-04, Carlos Bernardos
- Re: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider-04, Rolf Winter
Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Elwyn Davies
- Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Opsdir last call review of draft-kille-ldap-xmpp-schema-06, Joel Jaeggli
Policy for ISOC staff and board members regarding the IETF Nomcom, Gonzalo Camarillo
Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-cubic-06, Joel Halpern
TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09, Colin Perkins
- RE: TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09, Linda Dunbar
  - Re: TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09, Colin Perkins
    - RE: TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09, Linda Dunbar
Secdir last call review of draft-kille-ldap-xmpp-schema-06, Yoav Nir
Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-14, Stefan Winter
Secdir last call review of draft-dawkins-iesg-nomcom-advisor-iaoc-03, Yaron Sheffer
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06.txt> (Micro-loop prevention by introducing a local convergence delay) to Proposed Standard, Stewart Bryant
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06.txt> (Micro-loop prevention by introducing a local convergence delay) to Proposed Standard, Robert Raszuk
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06.txt> (Micro-loop prevention by introducing a local convergence delay) to Proposed Standard, Stewart Bryant
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06.txt> (Micro-loop prevention by introducing a local convergence delay) to Proposed Standard, Alexander Vainshtein
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06.txt> (Micro-loop prevention by introducing a local convergence delay) to Proposed Standard, stephane.litkowski
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06.txt> (Micro-loop prevention by introducing a local convergence delay) to Proposed Standard, Stewart Bryant
    - RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06.txt> (Micro-loop prevention by introducing a local convergence delay) to Proposed Standard, stephane.litkowski
Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Liang Xia
- Re: [Teas] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Vishnu Pavan Beeram
  - 答复: [Teas] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Xialiang (Frank)
Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-sec-13.txt> (LISP-Security (LISP-SEC)) to Experimental RFC, Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-sec-13.txt> (LISP-Security (LISP-SEC)) to Experimental RFC, Fabio Maino
  - Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-sec-13.txt> (LISP-Security (LISP-SEC)) to Experimental RFC, Dino Farinacci
    - Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-sec-13.txt> (LISP-Security (LISP-SEC)) to Experimental RFC, Fabio Maino
Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained-03, Robert Sparks
- RE: [OPSAWG] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained-03, Adrian Farrel
Genart last call review of draft-kille-ldap-xmpp-schema-05, Stewart Bryant
- RE: Genart last call review of draft-kille-ldap-xmpp-schema-05, Steve Kille
  - RE: Genart last call review of draft-kille-ldap-xmpp-schema-05, Dave Cridland
    - Re: Genart last call review of draft-kille-ldap-xmpp-schema-05, Stewart Bryant
[Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10, Linda Dunbar
- R: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10, Fioccola Giuseppe
Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Dan Romascanu
- Re: [Teas] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Vishnu Pavan Beeram
  - Re: [Teas] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Dan Romascanu
    - Re: [Teas] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06, Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bier-architecture-08, Dan Romascanu
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bier-architecture-08, Alia Atlas
  - Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bier-architecture-08, Dan Romascanu
    - Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bier-architecture-08, Greg Shepherd
Blog: Strengthening Internet Security and Accommodating Data Center Requirements: Finding a Path Forward, Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: Blog: Strengthening Internet Security and Accommodating Data Center Requirements: Finding a Path Forward, Randy Bush
  - Re: Blog: Strengthening Internet Security and Accommodating Data Center Requirements: Finding a Path Forward, Kathleen Moriarty
Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10, Brian Haberman
- R: Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10, Fioccola Giuseppe
  - Re: R: Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10, Brian Haberman
    - R: R: Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10, Fioccola Giuseppe
      - Re: R: Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
        
        R: R: Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10, Fioccola Giuseppe
        
        Re: Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
        
        Re: Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10, Brian Haberman
        
        Re: Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
        
        Re: Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
        
        R: Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10, Fioccola Giuseppe
Good call to change venues, Eliot Lear
- Re: Good call to change venues, Lee Howard
  - Re: Good call to change venues, Ole Jacobsen
    - Re: Good call to change venues, Olaf Kolkman
      - Re: Not such a good call to change venues, John Levine
- Re: Good call to change venues, Toerless Eckert
  - Re: Good call to change venues, Ole Jacobsen
    - Re: Good call to change venues, Ray Pelletier
      - Re: Good call to change venues, Toerless Eckert
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-05.txt> (Happy Eyeballs Version 2: Better Connectivity Using Concurrency) to Proposed Standard, Warren Kumari
Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Ted Hardie
- Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Paul Hoffman
  - Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
    - Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Ted Hardie
      - Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Mark Nottingham
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Mark Nottingham
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Ext] [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Paul Hoffman
        
        Re: [Ext] [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
        
        Re: [Ext] [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Paul Hoffman
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Mark Nottingham
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Eliot Lear
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Mark Nottingham
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Mark Nottingham
      - Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Paul Hoffman
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Patrick McManus
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Tim Wicinski
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Ask Bjørn Hansen
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Mark Nottingham
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Eliot Lear
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Phillip Hallam-Baker
  - Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Mark Nottingham
  - Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Cullen Jennings
- Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Martin Thomson
- Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
  - Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Ted Hardie
    - Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
    - Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Stephen Farrell
      - Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Martin Thomson
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Patrick McManus
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Eliot Lear
  - Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Ask Bjørn Hansen
    - Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
- Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Toerless Eckert
  - Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
    - Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
      - Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Toerless Eckert
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Phillip Hallam-Baker
    - Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Toerless Eckert
    - Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Eliot Lear
      - Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Christian Huitema
        
        Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Eliot Lear
        
        Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Phillip Hallam-Baker
      - Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Eliot Lear
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Mark Nottingham
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Eliot Lear
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Tony Finch
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Warren Kumari
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Patrick McManus
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Eliot Lear
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Warren Kumari
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Christian Huitema
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), John Levine
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Patrik Fältström
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), John R Levine
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Patrik Fältström
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Ted Lemon
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Patrik Fältström
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Adam Roach
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Ted Lemon
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Martin Thomson
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Melinda Shore
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Patrik Fältström
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Martin Thomson
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), John R Levine
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Martin Thomson
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), John R Levine
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Tony Finch
        
        Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Martin Thomson
        
        Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh), Magnus Westerlund
RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Masataka Ohta
  - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
    - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, tom p.
      - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Denis Ovsienko
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Carsten Bormann
        
        Re: Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Denis Ovsienko
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Carsten Bormann
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Stephane Bortzmeyer
        
        Re: Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Denis Ovsienko
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Julian Reschke
        
        Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Carsten Bormann
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Tim Bray
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Carsten Bormann
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Martin Thomson
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Viktor Dukhovni
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Carsten Bormann
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Carsten Bormann
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Keith Moore
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Randy Bush
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Keith Moore
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Leif Johansson
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Hardie
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Matthew Kerwin
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        BOM-free tests [was Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: BOM-free tests [was Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Ted Lemon
        
        Re: BOM-free tests [was Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], tom p.
        
        Re: BOM-free tests [was Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Doug Royer
        
        Re: BOM-free tests [was Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Carsten Bormann
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Carsten Bormann
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Carsten Bormann
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Carsten Bormann
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Matthew Kerwin
        
        Message not available
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, tom p.
        
        So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Matthew Kerwin
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Carsten Bormann
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Matthew Kerwin
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Brian E Carpenter
        
        Message not available
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], tom p.
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Matthew Kerwin
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Julian Reschke
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], tom p.
        
        FTP and file transfers (was: Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]), John C Klensin
        
        Re: FTP and file transfers (was: Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]), Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: FTP and file transfers, Joe Touch
        
        Re: FTP and file transfers, Nick Hilliard
        
        Re: FTP and file transfers, John C Klensin
        
        Re: FTP and file transfers, Keith Moore
        
        Re: FTP and file transfers, Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: FTP and file transfers, Doug Royer
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], John C Klensin
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], John C Klensin
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Yoav Nir
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Andrew G. Malis
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Stewart Bryant
        
        Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?], Joel M. Halpern
        
        Re: page numbers or not, was So do both, John Levine
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Matthew Kerwin
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Lyndon Nerenberg
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Lyndon Nerenberg
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, tom p.
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Carsten Bormann
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Carsten Bormann
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Matthew Kerwin
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, George Michaelson
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Paul Hoffman
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Carsten Bormann
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Martin J. Dürst
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, tom p.
    - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Masataka Ohta
      - Brief history against non-ASCII RFCs (was Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters), Masataka Ohta
      - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Lyndon Nerenberg
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Masataka Ohta
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Benjamin Kaduk
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Masataka Ohta
      - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Stephane Bortzmeyer
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Masataka Ohta
    - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Toerless Eckert
      - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Julian Reschke
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Toerless Eckert
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Julian Reschke
      - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Stephane Bortzmeyer
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [rfc-i] RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, HANSEN, TONY L
  - Re: [rfc-i] RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Patrik Fältström
- Re: [rfc-i] RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Martin J. Dürst
  - Re: [rfc-i] RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Mark Nottingham
  - Re: [rfc-i] RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Patrik Fältström
- Re: [rfc-i] RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Tim Bray
  - Re: [rfc-i] RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Jari Arkko
- Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Julian Reschke
  - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
    - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Julian Reschke
    - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Julian Reschke
      - Re: [rfc-i] RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Keith Moore
  - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, John Levine
    - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Keith Moore
      - Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, John R Levine
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Keith Moore
        
        Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [rfc-i] RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters, Frank Ellermann
Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-maxra-03, Rich Salz
Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-udp-06, Francis Dupont
Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-04, Jari Arkko
IETF 100 Social Event Tickets Now Available!, IETF Secretariat
Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-dh-group-exchange-05, Susan Hares
getting w3c to point to current RFCs, Michael Richardson
- Re: getting w3c to point to current RFCs, Julian Reschke
- Re: getting w3c to point to current RFCs, Mark Nottingham
  - Re: getting w3c to point to current RFCs, Julian Reschke
    - Re: getting w3c to point to current RFCs, Mark Nottingham
  - Re: getting w3c to point to current RFCs, Michael Richardson
  - Re: getting w3c to point to current RFCs, John C Klensin
- Re: getting w3c to point to current RFCs, Phillip Hallam-Baker
  - Re: getting w3c to point to current RFCs, John C Klensin
  - Message not available
    - Re: getting w3c to point to current RFCs, Phillip Hallam-Baker

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IP Storage] [Linux SCTP] [IETF]

Powered by Linux